X3 Photo Gallery Support Forums
We need a "Like" button hereMartin wrote:No problem at all...you guys have given us so many free upgrades over the last years, I've no objection paying for a complete new product!mjau-mjau wrote:...Also, there will likely be a small upgrade fee ...
This will be possible in a future version. At this point there is random sorting, but it may cache in your browser.eskimo121 wrote:On a different note:
.Speaking on behalf of the forthcoming version, HTML5 semantics, SEO and meta tags will be top priority. Although the gallery will be dynamic, each folder and file will be represented by an URL directly accessible for crawlers and for deep-linking, and each URL will have optimized meta data. In this age, a lot of the SEO involves making the page readable by the social services, and linking up with social accounts and authors. Important factors are the OGP protocol, Twitter markup, the Google schema markup (which is what you are referring to). This in addition to new html5 elements, which in itself offer better SEO, ref.: http://www.searchenginejournal.com/html ... eos/62512/. Here is a document that lists most of the important meta tags that should not be ignored: http://www.iacquire.com/blog/18-meta-ta ... e-in-2013/.Artur wrote:I'm wondering about the HTML version. Is there any chance to get this area extended?
Any news about a x3 sandbox?mjau-mjau wrote:ok, let me get this out next week ... Don't initially expect to be blown away though. Currently working from the inside out, means getting the system working in terms of functionality and speed in a traditional layout, which will be extended upon later.
Arrrghtschortsch wrote:Any news about a x3 sandbox?
... was supposed to have it out yesterday! I got stuck in the mud perfecting the new html5 audio player, which is gonna be quite cool. Please give me this week, and thanks for asking.That sounds great!mjau-mjau wrote:Speaking on behalf of the forthcoming version, HTML5 semantics, SEO and meta tags will be top priority. Although the gallery will be dynamic, each folder and file will be represented by an URL directly accessible for crawlers and for deep-linking, and each URL will have optimized meta data. In this age, a lot of the SEO involves making the page readable by the social services, and linking up with social accounts and authors. Important factors are the OGP protocol, Twitter markup, the Google schema markup (which is what you are referring to). This in addition to new html5 elements, which in itself offer better SEO, ref.: http://www.searchenginejournal.com/html ... eos/62512/. Here is a document that lists most of the important meta tags that should not be ignored: http://www.iacquire.com/blog/18-meta-ta ... e-in-2013/.Artur wrote:I'm wondering about the HTML version. Is there any chance to get this area extended?
The links you sent me which are part of schema.org, I will look into ... These items do not benefit SEO to any large degree, but are mainly to better describe content so it can be parsed by social services, and in some cases applications and browsers for better rendering and understanding of content. Definitely something to add, especially the more obvious ones that can be extracted from basic data, like author, title, description, date.
