My Portfolio
Posted: 19 Dec 2017, 09:06
Hi guys, i created my portfolio site and I would like you to have a look at it: https://www.pietrobiondo.it
Tell me if you like it ;-)
Thanks so much!!
Tell me if you like it ;-)
Thanks so much!!
Perfect! :clap: ... and great photography of course.pietro_biondo wrote:Hi guys, i created my portfolio site and I would like you to have a look at it: https://www.pietrobiondo.it
Thank you very much for the advice, I increased the resolution of the logo and set the "grid" layout for the "architectural" gallery.mjau-mjau wrote:Perfect! :clap: ... and great photography of course.pietro_biondo wrote:Hi guys, i created my portfolio site and I would like you to have a look at it: https://www.pietrobiondo.it
Almost perfect :slight_smile: I have two suggestions for improvements:
- Your logo is really nice, but it doesn't look great on my RETINA Macbook and smartphones (high-density resolution screens). If possible, you should upload your logo at DOUBLE resolution (460 x 140 px), so that it looks crisp also on retina screens. It will still display at 230 x 70 on screen, but the double resolution will make it look nice and crisp also on retina screens.
- I like your choice of gallery layout "vertical", but this option doesn't work well for galleries with portrait-aspect images. For example, the Architectural page has portrait-aspect images that require me to scroll up/down to see the entire image [screenshot]. Perhaps consider a GRID layout for this gallery? The other galleries look fine with the vertical scroll gallery layout, but there is nothing wrong in using a different layout to accommodate different galleries.
What is the link where you see this? I can't reproduce this issue from here, and I have never heard of it before. I would require more information to diagnose this on your side.pietro_biondo wrote:A question I would like to ask you, I noticed that when I open an image this is seen at high quality only for a very short period of time, then it is rendered with a poor quality, is there a way to avoid this?
Thank you so much again for the advice and for the compliments :)
When I click on an image it loads for a very short amount of time in high quality, look here: https://image.ibb.co/fcLFZm/Immagine.pngmjau-mjau wrote:What is the link where you see this? I can't reproduce this issue from here, and I have never heard of it before. I would require more information to diagnose this on your side.
I chose a maximum resolution of 2560px in height so on QHD mobile devices like my s7 edge the images are best seen when I open themmjau-mjau wrote:Although probably not related, I did notice that you have unnecessarily large images uploaded at 3840 x 2560 px. Any reason you did not resize to a more web-friendly size before upload? The X3 uploader has a default option "Resize to 1600 px" because it is good balance between file size and quality, and basically a good idea.
I can tell you what X3 DOES: Immediately after click, X3 will use the SRC of the smaller image you actually clicked to display temporarily in the popup, while a larger image is loading. In no way whatsoever will X3 first load a high-res image and replace it with a low-res image ... It only LOADS one image 100% sure. If anything, you are seeing the original SRC of the image you clicked, before the target image is loaded, but it seems the target src is incorrect. If anything else is happening, I can only imagine this is a browser plugin or some other issue on your side. It's certainly not built-in or expected behavior in X3.pietro_biondo wrote:When I click on an image it loads for a very short amount of time in high quality, look here: https://image.ibb.co/fcLFZm/Immagine.png
After a few ms this is seen at low quality: https://image.ibb.co/j6rNEm/Immagine2.jpg
S7 is 2560 x 1440, so if you want to optimize for this screen, it would be logical to resize LONG side of images to 2560 px, so your images would be 2560 x 1700 px (instead of 3840 x 2560 px) ... quite a big difference in file size. Now 95% of your visitors are loading images that are scaled down 20-50% on screen, with 400% larger file sizes than necessary.mjau-mjau wrote:I chose a maximum resolution of 2560px in height so on QHD mobile devices like my s7 edge the images are best seen when I open them
Ok I also visited the demo site and I did not notice any problems, it will be my problem or the downscale of the QHD image at a full-hd resolution like my screen.mjau-mjau wrote:I can tell you what X3 DOES: Immediately after click, X3 will use the SRC of the smaller image you actually clicked to display temporarily in the popup, while a larger image is loading. In no way whatsoever will X3 first load a high-res image and replace it with a low-res image ... It only LOADS one image 100% sure. If anything, you are seeing the original SRC of the image you clicked, before the target image is loaded, but it seems the target src is incorrect. If anything else is happening, I can only imagine this is a browser plugin or some other issue on your side. It's certainly not built-in or expected behavior in X3.
- I cannot reproduce this issue from here. Never seen or heard of it before.
- It has never been reported before by anybody.
- Do you see the same behavior in our demo?
- I would recommend checking from another device.
- We can ask other to test from the forum.
I chose to use 2560px in height because I noticed that most people are so lazy that they do not rotate the device to see the image.mjau-mjau wrote:
S7 is 2560 x 1440, so if you want to optimize for this screen, it would be logical to resize LONG side of images to 2560 px, so your images would be 2560 x 1700 px (instead of 3840 x 2560 px) ... quite a big difference in file size. Now 95% of your visitors are loading images that are scaled down 20-50% on screen, with 400% larger file sizes than necessary.
Anyway, this issue is not critical and not related to the main issue (unless your browser for some reason is replacing high-res images for some reason). Just thought I'd mention it.
I can't replicate it...mjau-mjau wrote: If anything else is happening, I can only imagine this is a browser plugin or some other issue on your side. It's certainly not built-in or expected behavior in X3.
- ...
- We can ask other to test from the forum.