Yes... I see.mjau-mjau wrote:As for if a logo is exactly displaying at 320 or not, that is a relative question, likely because there is also necessary PADDING included.
The padding is something I didn't realize.
And again... indeed.mjau-mjau wrote:I can see there is an imperfection here that the logo without padding is not actually displaying at the width you set it to in CSS, but this should not be a general obstacle as the CSS is generally available as a tool to adjust settings.
The dimensions in the CSS can be changed to any value, so it shouldn't be necessarily 320 or 640. A setting of 400 does indeed enlarge the logo.